b. The normed vector space l∞ is the space of infinite sequences with the norm ∥{xi}∥∞=supi{∣xi∣}. That is, the space of all bounded sequences.
c. The normed vector space C[a,b] is the space of continuous functions with the norm ∥f∥c=supx∈[a,b]{∣f(x)∣}. That is, the space of bounded continuous functions on [a,b].
Show that the norms defined in the previous example are indeed norms.
Show that there are sequences in l∞ that do not belong to
l2. Hint: Find one of them.
Show that ∥{xi}∥n:=n∑i=1∞∣xi∣nn→∞⟶supi{∣xi∣}.
Convince yourself that, unlike the finite-dimensional case, an infinite-dimensional normed space is not necessarily complete. To illustrate this, consider the normed vector space l0∞, which is a subspace of l∞ consisting of all bounded sequences with only a finite number of non-zero terms. Each sequence {xi}n=(1,1/2,1/3,…,1/n,0,0,…) is in
l0∞, the sequence of sequences {{xi}n} is Cauchy
(∥{xi}m−{xi}n∥∞=n+11n→∞⟶0)
and converges to the sequence {xi}∞=(1,1/2,1/3,…)∈l∞which does not belong tol0∞. Therefore, l0∞ is not complete.
See that in l2 the unit ball is not compact.
Hint: find an infinite sequence in the unit ball that has no accumulation point.
Exercise 2. Hilbert Spaces The following identity for norms arising from a scalar product is called the parallelogram law,
∥x+y∥2+∥x−y∥2=2(∥x∥2+∥y∥2).
Show that a norm satisfies it if and only if it comes from an inner product. Hint: Use the so-called polarization identity to define an inner product from the norm,
Exercise 3. Orthonormal Bases Use Gram-Schmidt to obtain an orthonormal basis from the monomials
1,x,x2,…,xn,…,
with respect to the Hilbert spaces obtained from the following inner products:
⟨f,g⟩=∫−11fˉgdx (In this case you will obtain the
Legendre polynomials.)
⟨f,g⟩=∫−∞∞fˉge−x2dx
(In this case you will obtain the Hermite polynomials.)
⟨f,g⟩=∫0∞fˉge−xdx
(In this case you will obtain the Laguerre polynomials.)
Exercise 4 Linear maps and dual spaces
Let ϕ:H→C be a linear map. Show that ϕ is continuous
if and only if it is bounded.
Show that the map I:C[a,b]→ℜ given by
I(f):=∫abf(x)dx,
is a linear and continuous map.
Let V be a finite-dimensional space and let {ui},i=1..n
be a basis and {θi},i=1..n the corresponding dual basis. Let x=∑i=1nxiui be any vector in V and ω=∑i=1nωiθi be any linear functional, i.e., an element of V′. Consider the norm in V
∥x∥p:=(i=1∑n∣xi∣p)p1.
See that this is a norm and prove that the norm induced in V′ by this is given by,
∥ω∥q:=(i=1∑n∣ωi∣q)q1,
where
p1+q1=1(p,q≥1);
Hint: Express ω(x) in components with respect to the given bases/dual bases and then use (prove) Holder's inequality:
∣i=1∑nxiωi∣≤(i=1∑n∣xi∣p)p1(i=1∑n∣ωi∣q)q1.
Optional! Let c0 be the space of sequences
{x}=(x1,x2,…) converging to zero (limn→∞xn=0) with the norm
∥{x}∥c0:=isup{∣xi∣}.
Prove that the dual of the space c0 is the space l1 of absolutely summable sequences {ω}=(ω1,ω2,…) with the norm
∥{ω}∥l1:=i=1∑∞∣ωi∣.
Hints: Note that given an element of l1, {ω}=(ω1,ω2,…), we have a linear functional given by,
ω({x}):=i=1∑∞xiωi.
Prove that this satisfies
∥ω∥≤∥{ω}∥l1.
Then find an element of norm equal to or less than one in c0 and with its help see that
∥ω∥≥∥{ω}∥l1.
From which it is concluded that the norms are the same, that is, the map that sends l1→c0′ is an isometry. Warning! one is tempted to use as the element above xn=sign(yn) but that vector might not be an element of c0!, so a limiting procedure must be used. It only remains to see that for each element of the dual of c0, ω, there exists an element of l1, {ω}=(ω1,ω2,…) such that ω({x})=∑i=1∞xiωi holds. To do this, construct a basis of c0 and the respective basis of its dual. Note: at some point, you will have to use that the considered linear functionals are continuous.
It illustrates how to get some information from it, but also that makes mistakes. The process of learning something is more complicated than just the process of getting the information. One has to formulate questions and attep to answer them. Produce and carry on ejamples and exercises, mostly simple ones.
c0 is a natural subspace of ℓ∞ (all sequences that "vanish at infinity").
The dual pairing ℓ1=c0∗ reflects that ℓ1-sequences can "integrate" against c0-sequences, but not against general ℓ∞-sequences (where finitely additive measures are needed).
You're absolutely right to question this! The argument I gave was incorrect because x=(sgn(yn)) is not necessarily in c0 for an arbitrary y∈ℓ1. (For example, if y=(1,1/2,1/3,…), then x=(1,1,1,…), which does not converge to 0.)